Legal · Powered by JustineAI™
Practice scale you couldn’t justify the headcount for.
You run a plaintiff-side personal-injury practice. Maybe two paralegals, an associate, a partner. Maybe a solo practice with you and the courthouse. JustineAI™ deploys Monday morning. Here’s what changes:
The intake interview produces a case file with per-field provenance and validator-council checking. The 50,000-page records dump turns into a curated chronology by the next morning. The demand letter writes itself through four authoring passes with CourtListener citation verification at every pass. The Demand Package assembles in one click. The cases you can credibly take just changed.
That’s the personal-injury edition, in market today. Five more JustineAI editions follow.
Five capabilities. All in production. Attorney-attested by design.
Every output is work product. The must-review-before-final gate is non-dismissible. Attorney-client privilege is preserved by structuring every operation under the supervision of the attorney of record. Audit logs record every reasoning step, decision, and revision — exportable for litigation discovery, malpractice insurance, and ethics review.
- GA
Run case intake with per-field provenance and validator council
Justine’s Workspace v1.2: every fact captured during intake carries its source, its confidence level, and a validator-council check before it lands on the case file. Nothing in the file is unsourced.
- GA
Curate up to 50,000 pages of medical records into a usable chronology
Nine-step Curation Layer over the entire records production. ICD-10 and CPT validation. Treatment timeline reconstruction. The chronology that used to take a paralegal three weeks is ready for attorney review the day after intake.
- GA
Draft a demand letter through a four-pass pipeline
Four-pass authoring with CourtListener citation verification at each pass. Every cited authority is checked against the live database. No fabricated cases. The letter that survives the partner review is the same letter that survives the carrier’s pre-suit team.
- GA
Assemble the entire Demand Package in one click
Cover letter, Medical Chronology, Bill Stack, exhibit index. Output is signature-ready. The package an associate used to assemble over a long weekend is built between coffee and the next intake call.
- GA
Operate across 50 states + DC; with curated case-law packs in the top-10 PI states
Per-jurisdiction practice rules, statute of limitations tracking, venue-specific demand norms. The top-ten PI states ship with curated case-law packs maintained by Justine. Other jurisdictions have full coverage with active maintenance behind it.
Two editions in active wave-prep. Founding-customer slots open.
- Coming Next
Run mass-tort inventory work with thousands of plaintiff sub-agents in one reasoning context
Mass Tort edition. One Justine supervisor coordinates thousands of plaintiff sub-agents in a single reasoning context — bellwether scoring, settlement-matrix modeling at scale, lien negotiation across the plaintiff pool, plaintiff fact-sheet auto-population. The supervisor + sub-agent pattern is the architectural moat for inventory work.
- Coming Next
Run workers’-comp practice across all major state markets
WC edition. State-specific filings (CA DWC 5021/PR-2, NY C-4, FL DWC-25, TX DWC-69), AME/PQME analysis, MMI tracking, MTUS/ACOEM treatment-utilization review, permanent-impairment rating modeling, Medicare Set-Aside coordination. ChironAI™ Occupational Medicine is the upstream feed — cross-portfolio reasoning, not a hand-off.
Three more editions on the same Eve-Legal F5/reasoner. Architectural commitments, not yet shipping.
- Roadmap
Build medical-malpractice cases over multi-provider chronologies in a single reasoning pass
Medical Malpractice edition. Multi-provider chronology across 5,000–50,000 pages per case in a single 10M-token context — the model reads the entire record set in one thought. Causation reasoning anchored to cited standard-of-care deviations, Daubert challenge preparation, certificate-of-merit drafting, expert-witness management.
- Roadmap
Litigate insurance bad faith with carrier-pattern detection
Insurance Bad Faith edition. Carrier policy-language interpretation clause-by-clause. Claim-file analysis assembled into a jury-ready narrative. Claim-handler deposition preparation against prior testimony and the file’s own contradictions. Brandt fees calculation. Prior-claim pattern detection across the carrier’s portfolio when public.
- Roadmap
Run employment class actions and FLSA collective certification at class scale
Employment Class edition. Rule 23 / FLSA collective certification motion practice. Damages modeling at class scale from production data. FLSA fluctuating-workweek calculations layered with liquidated damages and prejudgment interest. Opt-in conversion tracking. EEOC charge orchestration at class scale.
The capability changes shape with the seat at the table.
General Counsel
Continuous regulatory-exposure reasoning across every active matter. Disagreement between models surfaces uncertainty before output reaches outside counsel; that uncertainty signal is structured, logged, and reviewable. Your malpractice posture improves because every step in the reasoning chain is traceable to the model that produced it and the human who reviewed it.
Managing Partner
Practice scale you couldn’t justify the headcount for. Solo and small-firm practitioners gain the case-management capacity of a 50-attorney firm. Mid-market firms become credible bidders for mass-tort inventory work. The economic structure of mid-market plaintiff-side practice changes; the cases your firm can credibly accept changes with it.
Practice Group Lead (PI)
Throughput goes up because the demand-letter pipeline runs as a structured workflow, not as a series of one-off draft cycles. Quality goes up because per-field provenance and CourtListener verification eliminate the citation-error class of errors. Settlement timelines compress.
Solo Plaintiff Attorney
Day-one access to the case-management capability that used to require a partner-track associate and two paralegals. The economic profile of solo PI practice changes. The cases worth taking change with it.
Attorney-client privilege preserved by architecture. Every operation runs under the supervision of the attorney of record. Customer matter data is never used for training. The reasoning artifacts are work product, structured and treated as such. The architectural posture is bounded agency: Justine reasons, the attorney decides.
Audit-trail-by-default. Every reasoning step, decision, and revision is recorded — retained for the contractual period and exportable for litigation discovery, malpractice insurance, and ethics review. Your e&o profile improves because the documentation profile improves.
Citation verification by default. Every cited authority in a Justine-drafted document is checked against CourtListener before it leaves the system. The fabricated-citation failure mode that has cost attorneys their licenses cannot occur in this workflow because the verification step is non-bypassable.
Every capability above is delivered by Justine, the Digital Employee for legal services, running on Eve-Legal F5/reasoner. Five cooperating models per request: Microsoft Phi-3 as classifier; the Phi-4-derived Eve-Legal small reasoning model as the workhorse; Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 and OpenAI GPT-5.4 as frontier slots; and Meta Llama 4 Scout for the 10-million-token longitudinal context that lets Justine read an entire case file in a single thought.
If your CTO wants the full architectural argument: the Compound Reasoning capability page explains why this is auditable, defensible, and replaceable at the model layer without retraining the orchestrator.
Browser-deployable. Your matter inventory. Your jurisdiction.
Pilot deployments are scoped to your existing case mix and your existing workflow. No matter-management migration. No retraining. No procurement-cycle prerequisite. Onboarding is measured in days, not quarters.